Mumbai: As seven out of 10 patients with head-and-neck cancers in India reach hospitals only after the disease has severely advanced, doctors — ahead of World Head and Neck Cancer Day on July 27 — underlined the importance of routine screening for oral cancer.The Mazgaon-based Head and Neck Cancer Institute of India (HNCII), along with NGOs Cancer Patients Aid Association, Indian Cancer Society and dentists, on Friday launched an awareness and screening campaign titled ‘In Cancer, Delay Is the Real Killer’.“The idea is to urge people to seek medical attention at the first sign of symptoms rather than postponing diagnosis or treatment,” HNCII founder Dr Sultan A Pradhan said. Head and neck cancers account for nearly 30% of all cancers in India, with tobacco use responsible for the majority of cases.The BMC also last year started screening for oral, cervical and breast cancer, but experts feel wider awareness is needed. In 2025, the BMC screened close to 3 lakh people for oral cancer, identifying 3,000 as suspected cases; 650 biopsies were conducted that further led to 24 patients getting diagnosed with oral cancer.On Friday, Dr Pradhan said, “We have made significant advances in the treatment of cancer, but these advances can only help if patients reach us in time.” Too often, people ignore a symptom, wait for it to disappear, postpone a consultation or delay treatment after diagnosis. “Our message is simple: if something is not right, get it checked. In cancer, delay is the real killer,” he added.People should not ignore persistent mouth ulcers, painless lumps in the neck, difficulty in swallowing or unexplained changes in voice, as these could be early warning signs of oral or head and neck cancers.

People from all walks of life participated in the protest

Mumbai: Under a heavy overcast sky and oppressive mid-monsoon humidity, Shivaji Park in Dadar witnessed a massive crowd—of roughly 3,000 protesters by police’s estimate—on the sixth day of student-led demonstrations in the city on Friday.Police lodged an FIR against five persons for participating in demonstrations in Shivaji Park as well as Tilak Nagar in Chembur and Santacruz in defiance of prohibitory orders on large public gatherings.The protest at Shivaji Park was scheduled to begin at 4pm, but it was swarming with imposing numbers well before the opening call, transforming Dadar into the epicentre of a growing youth movement. A central stage was erected for speakers, positioned under the gaze of the Meenatai Thackeray bust near the park’s main entrance. Unlike most protests that feature a loud protester with a ‘dafli’, this one had a set playlist: patriotic songs, songs from the movie ‘Rang De Basanti’, and track ‘Azaadi’ from ‘Gully Boy’.Within moments of commencement, the human tide stretched from the junction outside Shiv Sena Bhavan to the park gates. Police vans lined the main thoroughfares and the final stretch of Keluskar Road leading into the park was barricaded. Several protesters scrambled onto bollards and surrounding residential boundary walls to secure a vantage view of the stage.Attendees held placards like “Lathis are for criminals, why use them on students?” and “Everybody is gangsta until cockroaches start flying”. Adding to the visual spectacle, several young demonstrators arrived in full cosplay—including Captain America, Krrish, and a wildly popular Spider-Man.Interspersed throughout the dense crowd were people from all walks of life, brought together by shared frustration over exam leaks and crackdowns.Dr Adarsh Tajane (24), an intern at Sion Hospital who arrived straight from work in his medical scrubs and stethoscope, emphasised the need for systemic reform. “An example needs to be set for the future so that things like paper leaks don’t happen,” he said.For others, the motivation was personal. Dr Disha Vichare, a dentist wrapped in the Tricolour and holding a red rose, drew on her own experience with competitive exams. “I have been through NEET and understand the mental toll it can take,” she said. “Those students did not have to die, and moreover, people were beaten up for raising the issue.”The protest also drew first-time agitators like Shreesti Kumari (27), a copywriter originally from Jharkhand. She said police action against students in Delhi was the tipping point that pushed her out onto the street.Student Balraj Singh (19) stood holding a compilation of Bhagat Singh’s writings. “He stood for change,” he said.Broader solidarity brought cross-generational participation from across the city. Murtaza Engineer, an advocate in Bombay high court, arrived from Mazgaon with his wife, brother and 81-year-old mother. “My daughter is a surgeon at JJ Hospital. I don’t need to be here, but this is for the children of India,” he said. “My daughter has already cleared the exam, but we are asking for accountability. We shouldn’t need to protest for that.”Around 6.15pm, police personnel began slowly nudging the crowd out of the primary assembly zone. As the main gathering dispersed, smaller groups split off into surrounding feeder roads, briefly stalling traffic across Dadar.(With inputs from S Ahmed Ali)

Mumbai, July 22, 2026: More than 1,000 students and demonstrators gathered at Shivaji Park in Mumbai on Wednesday, braving heavy monsoon rain as part of a protest led by the social media-driven Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) movement. Protesters carrying placards and the Indian national flag raised slogans demanding accountability over alleged irregularities in the NEET examination and called for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The demonstration was held in solidarity with ongoing protests at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. Tensions escalated as police moved in to disperse the gathering, with hundreds of protesters detained and taken away in police vehicles, while demonstrators continued chanting slogans demanding justice, accountability and reforms in the education system.

Not far from a statue of BR Ambedkar, the architect of India’s Constitution, stood a 35-year-old woman holding a copy of the document. The NGO worker joining the students’ protest near Chembur’s Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Garden, looked unfazed by a last-minute relocation. Chembur was one of many pockets where demonstrations sprang up after organisers said police had rescinded permission for Azad Maidan, the city’s only officially designated protest site. “Protests are by their very nature disruptive. The point is to get the govt to listen to you,” she said. “So, having a designated space defeats the purpose, right? Wouldn’t it mean giving the police more control over the protest?”Her question goes to the heart of the question. The city has a notified protest ground in Azad Maidan, but it’s highly regulated and requires prior police permission and places limits on the size of the gathering as well as the timings. It’s a designated space that struggles to be seen. “Azad Maidan is like a black hole,” says Amita Bhattacharya, who took part in the Aarey agitation. “People walking on the road next to the Maidan also don’t get to know that a protest is going on in the Maidan.” So, the harder question is whether dissent can ever be contained within such a space by issuing prohibitory orders.Mumbai has a long history of political mobilisation. August Kranti Maidan, then Gowalia Tank, witnessed Mahatma Gandhi’s ‘Do or Die’ call in 1942. The city later saw the Royal Indian Navy uprising, the Samyukta Maharashtra movement, Datta Samant’s 1982 textile strike, Dalit Panther mobilisations and, more recently, anti-CAA protests playing out across open grounds.What the city lacked though was a legally recognised venue for public dissent. Azad Maidan became that space almost by default. Its location—close to Mantralaya, Bombay High Court and CST—made it the natural endpoint for marches. In 1997, after residents around Nariman Point complained about noise and traffic disruption near Mantralaya, the high court passed an interim order directing protest marches to culminate there. The arrangement was meant to be temporary. Instead, it governed Mumbai for nearly three decades.It took until March 2025 for the court to direct the state to notify Azad Maidan as the city’s designated protest site. The Public Meetings, Agitations and Processions Rules, 2025, however, turned it into a highly regulated space requiring permission, limiting protests from 9 am to 6 pm on working days, a cap of 5,000 participants, no indefinite occupations, and curbs during festivals, legislative sessions, VIP movement or on security grounds.The rules were almost immediately tested. The Manoj Jarange-led Maratha reservation agitation, though permitted only at Azad Maidan, spilled over into south Mumbai, bringing traffic to a standstill. This sharpened the older debate around the lack of sufficient public spaces for dissent.Around the world, democracies wrestle with the same tension: how to protect the right to protest while managing the disruption it inevitably causes. New York, for instance, has no equivalent of Azad Maidan or Jantar Mantar — peaceful assembly on streets, sidewalks and in parks is broadly protected without a permit, and only marches that block traffic or use amplified sound need one. But that openness too has limits: when Occupy Wall Street protesters tried to hold Zuccotti Park overnight in 2011, police cleared the encampment, and a court later let them return only without tents or sleeping bags.Urban scholar Tali Hatuka has argued that protest does not strictly need a sanctioned space at all: in situations of extreme grievance, people find ways around whatever barriers exist. What cities can do, in Hatuka’s view, is keep public space open rather than fenced.In Mumbai, though, accessible public spaces are on the decline. Pankaj Joshi, Principal Director, Urban Centre Mumbai, says Mumbai has roughly 1.2 square metres of public open space per person, far below cities such as Singapore, which provides around 39 sq m per resident. India’s own URDPFI planning guidelines recommend 10-12 sq m of open space per person — suggesting Mumbai’s shrinking public spaces are not an inevitable consequence of high population density, but rather the result of faulty urban planning. “Recently, the govt has begun diluting open spaces further by allowing developers to construct on playgrounds and recreation grounds through provisions in DCPR,” says Joshi.Oamkar, a youth who took part in the recent protests, says access to most public spaces in Mumbai is controlled. “What we need is open spaces where we can simply gather.”

Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer and Additional Chief Secretary S. Chockalingam on Thursday conducted a review of SIR process in Thane

Thane: Nearly six out of every 10 voters in Thane district have received enumeration forms under the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, a constituency-wise review of the ongoing process revealed.The review, conducted by Maharashtra chief electoral officer and additional chief secretary S. Chockalingam on Thursday, showed that Owala-Majiwada and Bhiwandi Rural Assembly constituencies recorded the highest distribution of enumeration forms, while Kalyan Rural and Kalyan West reported the lowest numbers so far. Chockalingam, during his address to officials, directed them to ensure completion of the revision of all stages within the prescribed timeline and maintain continuous monitoring of field-level work.“Officials have been instructed to ensure that Booth Level Officers (BLOs) conduct door-to-door verification, accurately fill enumeration forms, verify documents, process applications on time and clear pending cases. Authorities have also been told to remove ineligible entries strictly as per rules while ensuring that no eligible voter is left out,” an official present for the meet said.Meanwhile, even as the authorities push to complete the revision within the deadline, voters and political leaders raised concerns over difficulties in the process.NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad highlighted the case of a senior medical professional whose name was allegedly missing from the electoral roll despite having voted for several decades. In a video message shared on social media, Awhad questioned how elderly voters could be expected to stand in queues to locate their names and submit documents, including identity proofs of parents who have passed away.“I am a voter for decades, and am I expected to search my name standing in queues? They are also asking for documents of my father, who passed away years ago,” the professional said.On the other side of the suburbs, Shiv Sena (UBT)’s Rohidas Munde raised questions over the implementation of door-to-door verification in Diva. He alleged that instead of BLOs visiting voters’ homes, the process was increasingly dependent on special camps.“The purpose of SIR is physical verification of voters to check whether they still reside at the given address, have migrated or are deceased. If the process is limited to camps, senior citizens, persons with disabilities and those unable to visit may be excluded,” Munde said.

Bombay HC Bombay High Court at Mumbai is one of the oldest High Courts of India

Mumbai: The Bombay high court has set aside an order against a bank employee for sexual harassment under the POSH Act as the alleged offence took place in a shared auto that does not fall under the definition of “workplace.” The share-auto was not a ride that was employer-arranged and hence doesn’t fall under the definition of workplace under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act (POSH).The internal committee of a company or an organisation can entertain a complaint of an aggrieved woman of being subjected to sexual harassment only at the “workplace”, said the HC ruling by Justices Suman Shyam and F P Pooniwalla. The banker had moved the HC against the decision.In March 2023, the bank employee was travelling to his office in BKC from Kurla railway station in a shared auto. He was in the middle seat between the complainant woman and another passenger. The ride was bumpy due to bad roads and at times, his left hand must have touched her bag which she carried on her right arm, his lawyer argued. She stopped the ride and allegedly abused him and “abruptly” sprayed pepper spray into his eyes, alleging that he touched her inappropriately, said his plea. A crowd gathered, the auto driver asked everyone to sit back and proceed to the destination. He said she claimed to be related to an ex-public servant and called him, the police, her colleagues to “come and hit” him. The police arrived, took him to the police station and registered a case of sexual harassment under the Indian Penal Code.The HC said it has not gone into merits of the controversy of whether he had sexually harassed her in the shared auto or not.She also lodged a complaint with the internal committee or IC of her company. The IC forwarded the complaint to his employer. A probe was held and the bank’s internal committee found him “guilty of sexual harassment” and recommended “action as per service rules” against him. The bank’s IC concluded that the shared auto ride was indeed ‘workplace,’ as it invoked Section 2(o)(v) of POSH Act. The section stated that any place visited by the employee arising out of or during employment, including transportation by the employer for undertaking the journey, would mean a “workplace”.His counsel Anand Pande said the IC has erred since the transportation ought to have been provided by the employer, which the auto was not. The HC said, “It can be seen that Section 2(o)(v) includes within the meaning of “workplace” transportation by the employer for undertaking a journey to any place visited by the employee arising out of or during the course of employment. Therefore, in order to fall within the meaning of “workplace”, the transportation has to be provided by the employer,” which the bench said was not the case in this matter. The IC had not jurisdiction to entertain her complaint and pass an order, since the alleged incident did not occur at a ‘workplace’, HC held.

Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer and Additional Chief Secretary S. Chockalingam on Thursday conducted a review of SIR process in Thane

Thane: Nearly six out of every 10 voters in Thane district have received enumeration forms under the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, a constituency-wise review of the ongoing process revealed.The review, conducted by Maharashtra chief electoral officer and additional chief secretary S. Chockalingam on Thursday, showed that Owala-Majiwada and Bhiwandi Rural Assembly constituencies recorded the highest distribution of enumeration forms, while Kalyan Rural and Kalyan West reported the lowest numbers so far. Chockalingam, during his address to officials, directed them to ensure completion of the revision of all stages within the prescribed timeline and maintain continuous monitoring of field-level work.“Officials have been instructed to ensure that Booth Level Officers (BLOs) conduct door-to-door verification, accurately fill enumeration forms, verify documents, process applications on time and clear pending cases. Authorities have also been told to remove ineligible entries strictly as per rules while ensuring that no eligible voter is left out,” an official present for the meet said.Meanwhile, even as the authorities push to complete the revision within the deadline, voters and political leaders raised concerns over difficulties in the process.NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad highlighted the case of a senior medical professional whose name was allegedly missing from the electoral roll despite having voted for several decades. In a video message shared on social media, Awhad questioned how elderly voters could be expected to stand in queues to locate their names and submit documents, including identity proofs of parents who have passed away.“I am a voter for decades, and am I expected to search my name standing in queues? They are also asking for documents of my father, who passed away years ago,” the professional said.On the other side of the suburbs, Shiv Sena (UBT)’s Rohidas Munde raised questions over the implementation of door-to-door verification in Diva. He alleged that instead of BLOs visiting voters’ homes, the process was increasingly dependent on special camps.“The purpose of SIR is physical verification of voters to check whether they still reside at the given address, have migrated or are deceased. If the process is limited to camps, senior citizens, persons with disabilities and those unable to visit may be excluded,” Munde said.