Homeopaths questioned the inconsistent opposition

Mumbai: It’s one of Maharashtra’s medical paradoxes: why are practitioners of one traditional system of medicine—ayurveda—legally permitted to prescribe modern medicines in a limited capacity, while an attempt to extend a similar privilege to homeopaths has triggered an agitation by allopathic doctors?The answer lies in the route taken.Over three decades ago, a govt notification allowed qualified BAMS practitioners to prescribe specified allopathic medicines. The BAMS curriculum had by then expanded to include anatomy, physiology, pathology, surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, forensic medicine and pharmacology. BAMS students were also posted to allopathic hospitals during internship, giving them hands-on exposure to modern medicine.As oncologist Dr Purvish Parikh wrote in a 2023 paper published in South Asian Journal of Cancer, several states, including Maharashtra, MP, UP, Karnataka, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, issued circulars allowing ayurveda practitioners to use allopathic medicines and modes of treatment. The reason was practical: to enable ayurveda practitioners, especially in rural areas, to provide emergency care in situations such as heart attacks, snakebites, poisoning, complicated deliveries and trauma until specialised treatment is available.When homeopaths sought comparable rights, Maharashtra took a different path. It enacted Maharashtra Homeopathic Practitioners and Maharashtra Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 2014, introducing a one-year bridge course, after which BHMS graduates could prescribe specified allopathic medicines. It also allowed them to obtain dual registration—with both Maharashtra Homeopathy Council and Maharashtra Medical Council (MMC), the regulator for modern medicine. That decision began a long period of litigation.“IMA is agitated because a BHMS doctor was granted registration with MMC. But in 2014, when the amendment allowing dual registration was passed, MMC itself was headed by an IMA panel. Why didn’t they instead argue for changes like what was done for ayurveda?” asked a senior govt official.Homeopathy leaders said the opposition is inconsistent. “Ayurveda and unani practitioners have long been allowed to prescribe allopathic medicines without such protests. Why is the same principle unacceptable for homeopaths?” asked Dr Bahubali Shah of Maharashtra Homeopathy Council at a public forum on Tuesday.However, former state president Dr Jayant Lele said the issue is not only about prescribing rights but also about dual registration. If a patient dies, which system of medicine would be held responsible? Dual registration blurs legal and professional responsibility, argued Dr Lele.State officials said they cannot change the old Act or court directives. “We had to start MMC registrations due to a court directive. Moreover, since the 2014 amendment is part of the law, any change may require judicial intervention,” said an official. Bombay HC is scheduled to hear the matter on Aug 13-14.

UMC had dismissed Bhadane in 2023 after a departmental inquiry

–Ulhasnagar: Former Ulhasnagar municipal corporation (UMC) deputy commissioner Yuvraj Bhadane has secured significant legal relief with Bombay high court and a sessions court ruling in his favour in two separate cases that had led to his dismissal from civic service three years ago, reports Pradeep Gupta.Bhadane, who was fired after a departmental inquiry into several allegations primarily concerning discrepancies in his birth certificate and a rape case filed with Turbhe police, claimed the court orders have effectively cleared his name and paved the way for his reinstatement. His advocate Deepak Mishra alleged the cases against Bhadane were the result of a conspiracy by those upset over his demolition drives against illegal constructions.Addressing a news conference on Wednesday with his advocate Deepak Mishra, Yuvraj Bhadane said Belapur sessions court had acquitted him in the rape case after the complainant stated during the trial that he was not the person who had sexually assaulted her and that she was seeing him for the first time in court. Citing the absence of evidence and other deficiencies in the prosecution’s case, the court acquitted him.In the alleged manipulation of his date of birth records submitted at the time of joining service, HC upheld the validity of his birth certificate and directed the trial court not to frame charges against him, observing that there was no material to support allegations of manipulation.Mishra said since the courts had granted relief in both matters, the civic administration should reinstate Bhadane with all consequential service benefits, including consideration for promotion.UMC had dismissed Bhadane in 2023 after a departmental inquiry held allegations against him had been “proved”. Bhadane had once reported a person who allegedly tried to bribe him, leading to the individual’s arrest by Anti-Corruption Bureau. However, his own career has been marked by controversies.The allegation against Bhadane was that he had shown his date of birth as June 1, 1972, in his official records, whereas his actual birth year was 1970, and that he had secured the post in UMC using incorrect birth records. However, during the hearing, Bhadane’s counsel produced documents before the court, which accepted that his date of birth was indeed June 1, 1972.Meanwhile, Bhadane has also filed a writ petition before the Bombay high court challenging the UMC’s order dismissing him from service. The matter is currently pending adjudication before the HC.

Baba Siddique was gunned down on October 12, 2024, near his son Zeeshan ‘s office in Bandra East

Mumbai: A special MCOCA court on Wednesday issued a show cause notice to the investigating officer in 2024 murder case of senior NCP leader Baba Siddique “for prima facie wilful disobedience” of the court’s earlier order directing steps to secure the presence of absconding accused Anmol Bishnoi.Assistant commissioner of police Subhash Dudhgaonkar has been directed to file a written explanation on or before August 12, to show cause “as to why appropriate action should not be initiated” against him.Emphasising the obligation of investigating authorities to obey court orders, the judge observed, “Judicial orders are required to be obeyed by authorities entrusted with the administration of criminal justice. Once a lawful direction is issued by a competent court, it is incumbent upon the investigating officer to make sincere and bona fide efforts to comply with the same,” special judge Satyanarayan R Navander said. “In the present case, prima facie, the conduct of the investigating officer reflects deliberate disregard of the directions…”Siddiqui was gunned down on October 12, 2024, as he was leaving his son Zeeshan Siddiqui’s office in Bandra East.Bishnoi, alleged to be the main accused at whose behest the killing was carried out, is currently lodged in Tihar Jail after being arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Delhi following deportation from the US in November last year.On July 10, calling it unfortunate that the court has to issue directions to ensure compliance with procedure, the judge had directed the prosecution to secure Bishnoi’s custody and sought a compliance report after two weeks. The court had noted that if physical custody could not be obtained, Bishnoi’s production through videoconferencing could be explored. The court had also indicated that the investigating officer could visit the jail for interrogation, if permissible, while also securing Bishnoi’s virtual presence before the city court so that the trial was not delayed.The order came on a plea filed by Siddique’s wife Shehzeen, who alleged that the prosecution was deliberately avoiding taking the principal accused into custody. Advocates Pradip Gharat and Trivankumar Karnani, appearing for Shehzeen, submitted that the police were avoiding taking his custody to prevent the names of the “actual” conspirators from being revealed.The prosecution had argued that Bishnoi’s physical custody was necessary for interrogation, but such custody could not be obtained because the Government of India had, by an order dated December 5, 2025, prohibited Bishnoi’s removal from Tihar Jail for one year or until the conclusion of the Delhi case, whichever is earlier.Subsequently, the investigating officer obtained a production warrant from the Mumbai court and moved a Delhi court for Bishnoi’s physical production. The Delhi court rejected the request, relying on the same central government restraint order.On Wednesday, the intervenor filed another plea, formally accusing the police of filing an evasive, dishonest, and misleading report, in an alleged attempt to save the accused from a lawful trial.The MCOCA court found the compliance report filed by the police inadequate. The order recorded that the report was “conspicuously silent regarding any effort made to comply with the directions issued by this court in its order”. The court further noted, “There is no explanation as to why no attempt was made to secure the presence of the accused through videoconferencing or by adopting any other legally permissible mode as indicated by this court.”When Dudhgaonkar appeared before the court, he submitted that proper investigation could not be carried out unless Bishnoi’s physical custody was obtained, and therefore the option of production through videoconferencing was not pursued. Rejecting this explanation, the court observed, “The explanation offered by the investigating officer is wholly unsatisfactory. The directions issued by this court were explicit.”The court said the investigating officer had merely repeated an exercise “which was bound to fail in view of the existing restraint order” instead of making genuine efforts to comply with the court’s directions. The order stated, “The compliance report does not disclose any endeavour to implement the directions of this court in their true letter and spirit.”

MIDC police apprehended Mehtab Alam Ajimatullah Khan in Goa nine years after his escape

MUMBAI: MIDC police arrested a man from Goa and brought him to Mumbai on Tuesday nine years after he went absconding from the city after killing a scrapdealer in Bangarwadi at Subhash Nagar in Andheri (east) alongwith six others who were arrested then and are out on bail now after was in jail for over seven years.The accused, Mehtab Alam Ajimatullah Khan (46) who was aged 37 then, was tracked after the police team found out that he is working with a scrap dealer in Goa that undertakes govt tenders of scrapping.Khan kept changing his names after he fled to Karnataka and later relocated to Goa in 2020. The reason behind the murder of the scrap dealer was becoming a police informer and tipping off the whereabouts details to the Nashik police about one of the accused brother wanted in a serious offence in 2017.The breakthrough came in the case when the MIDC police team first picked Khan’s younger brother thinking that he is the one who had committed the murder.Subsequently, information regarding the accused was gathered via social media platforms (Instagram and Facebook) and verified through his friends and relatives.“Khan’s who resides in Santacruz was picked up 15 days ago. But during inquiry he told that he is not the one we are looking for. It is his elder brother who is lookalike to him and he is 10 years to Khan. However, he did not provide proper information about Khan. But the team kept a watch on him and got a lead using technical assistance and social media platforms to get hold of the accused photo,” said a police officer.Khan along with six others allegedly killed Wasimullah Mohsin Shaikh (41) on Feb 3, 2017, after they called him for a lunch party in the afternoon.“Shaikh along with his brother Abdul and friend Samsuddin attended the party organised by the seven accused. Later the seven, including Khan, bludgeoned Shaikh to death using iron rods while his brother and friend escaped with injuries. On learning, that the seven were picked up by the police soon after the murder, Khan fled the city and discontinued using his mobile and communicated less with his family members. The breakthrough came when the police started revisiting details of all old cases and gathered information of all wanted criminals in the police station, including Khan who was never arrested, using technical assistance,” said a police officer of the MIDC police station.DCP (West Zone-3) Datta Nalawade said despite exhaustive search efforts, he could not be located at the time; consequently, he was entered into the ‘Wanted Accused’ register, and the charge sheet for the said crime was submitted to the Honorable Court in 2017.After getting instructions from the senior officers to track all old cases and absconders, DCP Nalawade supervised the team, senior inspector Ghanshyam Nair, inspector Sunil Karande, assistant inspector Pravin Rakshe, constables Narayan Bhosale, Vishal Pisal, Tanaji Suryavanshi and Deepak Waghmare, that collected details of all scrapdealers on Instamart that undertakes acquire scrap contracts through govt tenders.Senior inspector Nair said the team led by assistant inspector Rakshe stayed in Goa for five days after filtering details of the scrap dealers that get govt tenders.“Eight such dealers were filtered and the team gathered information of the staffs working with them and finally Khan was arrested. Khan has changed his identity and was not staying permanently at one place because he travelled with labourers to different states where his employer gets the scrap tender. He had travelled to seven different states and never used mobile which made it difficult to nab him,” said assistant inspector Rakshe.Khan is in police custody for murder and under several IPC sections.

Mumbai: State govt has directed all public universities to carry out an immediate and in-depth physical inspection of every law college affiliated to them and submit a detailed report to Bar Council of India (BCI) within six weeks. The state’s directive follows BCI’s order which took serious cognisance of Supreme Court’s oral observations while hearing a petition regarding the deteriorating quality of legal education in the country. The apex court observed that the legal education centres were operating with inadequate facilities and without meeting the prescribed standards.In a letter to the universities, BCI mentioned that the SC observations “underscore the immediate need for every authority in the statutory and academic chain to discharge its own continuing responsibility with complete seriousness”. Mentioning that the universities’ responsibilities do not end with the initial grant of affiliation and that they should ensure that colleges do not merely run on the strength of paper compliance, it has sought a report on every affiliated college within six weeks.Universities have been directed to constitute one or more competent inspection teams to carry out immediate physical inspection of law colleges. The teams have been tasked with verifying the availability of faculty members, adequate classrooms, libraries, reading rooms, journals, law reports, electronic databases, land and building infrastructure, fire and safety compliance, sanitation facilities, legal aid clinics, and other essential requirements. They have also been instructed to notify BCI of any colleges found to have made false declarations, fabricated faculty records, submitted misleading photographs, shifted their premises without approval, or admitted students in excess of the permitted intake.BCI has directed the universities to submit a consolidated report by classifying institutions as fully compliant, deficient but capable of immediate correction without affecting academic standards and seriously deficient requiring suspension, non-renewal or withdrawal of affiliation.Prior to this, state govt and Mumbai University had initiated separate action against colleges that failed to comply with the prescribed norms. While the state took action against 103 colleges that did not have BCI recognition, the university reduced the intake capacity of 50 colleges by up to 50% and imposed fines of up to Rs 10 lakh for failing to appoint approved teachers.

The plan to install bio-absorbent sound barriers along the road bordering the bungalow premises was particularly panned

Mumbai: Hours after TOI’s report on Wednesday that the premises housing her official residence—a heritage bungalow in Byculla zoo—was set to undergo a revamp at Rs 2.9 crore within four months of a Rs 2.4-crore facelift, the BMC administration cancelled the tender and mayor Ritu Tawde distanced herself from it.The move came on the heels of massive public and political outrage, particularly over the plan to install bio-absorbent sound barriers along E S Patanwala Road bordering the premises.Earlier in the day, Tawde sought that the work be stayed. By evening, the zoo director’s department, which had floated the tender, proposed its cancellation and the civic administration accepted it.Tawde, who is also a BJP corporator, asserted that she had no connection with the tender and accused Shiv Sena (UBT) of spinning a “fake narrative”. “I have been staying at the mayor’s bungalow only for one-and-a-half months. I never asked for any upgrade. Mumbaikars are intelligent and will not believe such lies,” she said.Sources said city BJP chief Ameet Satam took cognisance of the matter, which led to Tawde seeking the tender’s cancellation and her office issuing a statement on the controversy. “The works mentioned in the tender are not for the mayor’s residence but for the surrounding areas and the zoo premises as a whole. The mayor has no knowledge of the tender, nor was there any reason for the mayor to be aware of it. The mayor has also not requested any of the proposed works,” said the statement.Opposition parties, however, weren’t convinced. Former mayor Kishori Pednekar from Shiv Sena (UBT) questioned how any work at the mayor’s official residence could have been proposed without her knowledge or consent. “It is impossible for such an upgrade to be undertaken without the mayor being aware of it,” she said.Targeting BJP, Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Aaditya Thackeray alleged that public money was being spent on the mayor’s “whims”. In a post on X, he criticised the proposed facelift, questioned the need for sound barriers in an otherwise quiet locality and alleged that BMC was prioritising such expenditure while “handing over Mumbai’s open spaces to private hands”.Congress’s leader in BMC Ashraf Azmi called the planned renovation a waste of taxpayers’ money.Criticism also came from Shiv Sena, BJP’s ally in BMC. Amey Ghole, Shiv Sena’s group leader in the civic House, sought action against the zoo department for proposing the work without the mayor’s consent.Besides the sound barriers, the renovation involved relaying interlocking concrete pavers after laying sewer, stormwater drainage and utility lines, construction of underground and overhead water tanks, renovation of rooms for domestic and security staffers, and fabrication and installation of container-based structures to house a conference hall, according to the tender, which was floated on July 31.

Many non-resident Indians plan to sell Indian properties soon (Representative image)

MUMBAI: A growing wave of non-resident Indians (NRIs) looking to sell residential properties in India is unlikely to dent the country’s housing market.Instead, it could improve choices for homebuyers by increasing the supply of ready-to-move-in homes while reflecting a broader shift in how globally settled Indians manage their wealth, according to a new report and an urban planning expert.The Remittor Annual NRI Wealth Report 2026 found that 46.4% of surveyed NRI property owners want to sell immediately, while another 26.2% plan to exit within six months, signalling a preference for liquidity and portfolio rebalancing rather than distress selling.However, the report says its findings are based on proprietary data from around 150 NRI clients and should be viewed as indicative of behavioural trends rather than representative of the overall Indian property market.The report attributes the trend to a structural shift among overseas Indians who migrated during the past two decades, particularly those who have now settled permanently in countries such as Canada, the US, the UK and Australia.Having established careers, homes and financial commitments abroad, many are reassessing Indian property as a financial asset rather than a legacy holding.Overseas mortgages, currency movements, tax compliance requirements and the desire to diversify investments are increasingly driving decisions to monetise real estate.Urban planner Dikshu C. Kukreja, Managing Principal of CP Kukreja Architects, said the trend should not be misconstrued as a sign of weakening confidence in India.“If a large proportion of NRIs choose to monetise their residential assets over the coming months, it should not necessarily be viewed as a sign of weakening confidence in India’s real estate market,” Kukreja said.“It reflects the natural evolution of a globally mobile investor who is rebalancing assets across geographies as financial priorities change.”For homebuyers, particularly in Mumbai and other major metros, the development could bring a wider selection of resale properties to the market.According to the report, well-located homes in Mumbai, Delhi-NCR, Bengaluru and Hyderabad continue to benefit from robust end-user demand, improving infrastructure and better urban connectivity.Additional resale inventory could enhance market liquidity, provide more ready-to-move-in options and promote more realistic price discovery without necessarily triggering a fall in property prices.Quality housing in established micro-markets is expected to remain resilient.The report identifies Maharashtra as the largest contributor to NRI resale listings, with most properties located in Mumbai, Thane and Pune.While Mumbai’s residential market has seen slower sales and a moderation in launches, it remains among India’s most liquid housing markets.Demand has increasingly shifted towards suburban locations such as Thane, Navi Mumbai and the western suburbs, supported by Metro expansion, the Coastal Road and the upcoming Navi Mumbai International Airport.Residential properties account for 88.8% of NRI assets being sold, with apartments making up nearly two-thirds of listings.The report says apartments are easier to transact because they typically have clearer titles, standardised documentation, structured housing society governance and lower management requirements for overseas owners.The study also highlights the growing complexity of owning property across borders.More than half of respondents reported difficulties accessing Indian tax portals, while many face compliance requirements related to tax deduction at source (TDS), FEMA regulations and overseas tax disclosures, factors that increasingly influence decisions to exit Indian real estate.Kukreja said the trend underscores the importance of continued investment in Indian cities rather than signalling a market slowdown.“The stronger our urban ecosystems become, the more Indian real estate will continue to attract both domestic and global capital, regardless of whether investors are buying, holding or monetising their assets,” he said.For developers and investors, the report concludes, the emerging trend is less about capital leaving India and more about the evolution of NRI wealth management, where property is increasingly treated as one component of a globally diversified investment portfolio rather than an asset to be held indefinitely.